Christian Boltanski

Christian Boltanski

               Christian Boltanski was born on September 6th, 1944 in Paris, France. He still lives there today. He is 67 years old and has been an artist since he was only 14 years old.  When he was young, he was a very good painter and he decided to pursue his artistic interests rather than go to school.  He was not noticed for his work until 1960 when he released some short films and published a few notebooks.  

               He had a number of exhibitions.  His first exhibition was in 1968, when he was just 24. This exhibition was presented through a short film and many sketches with life-sized marionettes. His work then continued into the 1970's where he created photo albums and autobiographic films on what his childhood was and could have been. He was known for also creating fictional characters.  He also created photo albums and autobiographical films using his fictional characters. He created autobiographies of the person, what they liked, and what they did.  He included actual objects and journal entries.

               In 1976, he released his concept of "average taste" through his work. In this portion of his career, he withdrew to what he did as a child. He took photographs using an amateur skill and printed them in painting sized dimensions. He thought this would appeal better to the average person, which it did. In 1985, he started over again, trying new things. The "Monuments" series was born. In this, he created many photos to be represented on a massive scale. He printed photos and placed them in altar-like settings and filled entire rooms with photos lit by small lights, almost like stars.

               Christian Boltanski's work is very moving and experimental. His photos range from simple portraits of people to mounds of clothes. His work can be very odd and in some cases just flat-out strange.  But for some reason people are drawn to them likely for the sole reason that they are unique. Christian has a way of taking very simple things and making the viewer think about them. He takes a single object from a fictional character's childhood and is able to create an entire story from it. He takes simple, "amateur" style photographs and turns them into works of art. A good example is this photograph.

This is Christians gallery on March 1st of 2001 called "Coming and Going" in New York. He took many'a'photo and placed them in completely random order, using simple frames and hard, coloured light to create his final product. It's simple, very simple, and yet it looks absolutely fantastical. The way the portraits are aligned, the way he arranges the lights on the wall in a square-like pattern. Everything is simple. People believe this to be his best trait. He takes simple things and makes them seem like masterpieces. Christian says that he can take from 10 minutes to 10 years to come up with an idea, and in the end it's still a simple one, one that anyone could think of, one that seems stupid. He finds it silly how easy it is to make money once you are famous. "They give me money and I give them nothing". He said this during his exhibition in Mexico, where he had a 600 square foot room to work with. He decided to display blue tarps over a wooden frame that would  be covered in hard white light to create pure black shadows. He then says that afterward, he had it destroyed.

This was his work before his exhibition in Mexico, he said that "the shapes will be different". It was just an idea of course, which was why instead of actually going to Mexico, all he did was send a letter to tell them how to create it and set up.

One final thing about Christian Boltanski is his philosophy of living and dying. Many people find it incredibly moving in how he thinks of his life and work.

For instance, this is one of his works in Paris at the Grand Palais. It is of a grid pattern of clothing and in the centre a massive amount of wrecked sweaters, dress', pants and shirts. A small crane goes up and down, lifting and dropping small amounts of clothing back onto the 50 tonne mound of clothes. The art is as simple as the process of picking up and dropping the clothes, as well as it is pointless. The entire building is filled by the sound of heart-beats. These are recordings of over 50,000 people, their heartbeats all unique, just like all of his work. His philosophy follows the same idea, we all have unique properties but at the same time we are all so simple. This work is so far from the fact  of death and yet so close to the idea. His work has all sorts of attributes that are similar to death, the slow heartbeat of a person, who at some point, will not have a beat of any kind. The dust covering all his work to show that time has effects even on simple objects, and even the clothing itself, bright children's clothing to old tattered shirts from a garbage bin. He does not believe in art as being a preservation of one's self, just an extension. He does not like people who create art in hopes that they will live forever, he believes that we must be content with the idea of dying. A lot of people have trouble grasping this idea since it is so impossible to ignore.

               He says that he usually sits around and doesn't do much.  The life of art is easy for him and he finds it too easy at times. He creates such simple things and doesn't really care what happens to them. Whenever he creates a large exhibition, he says he tries his best to organize his pieces to create a beginning and an end.  He wants people to feel uncomfortable or at least uncomfortable with the fact that the show will eventually end. Doing this creates a great emotional response in his viewers, which many people find terrific.

This was the photo taken by me chosen from about twenty just like it. It was hard to decide which one was the best when they were almost identical. I decided to do the exact same thing Christian did for his Mexico project. I asked Rachel Wolf and Samantha Kelly to randomly throw their coats on a table in the studio. Just like the people in Mexico had done for his gallery, I had Rachel and Samantha follow simple instructions. Then I set up 2 lights without a diffuse and put as close as possible to create the hardest shadows possible. I used coats instead of a tarp because I wanted to fuse 2 of his best pieces together. From his work in the Grand Palais in Paris and from his gallery in Mexico. Using the harsh light on random articles of clothing helps me convey two different ideas very well. The fact that we are just teenagers and we have a lot of life ahead of us, hence the use of new-looking clothing instead of a mix of clothing like Christian used. Christian was always so obsessed with the idea of death, this was why he always had old material in his pieces. Since we are young, I decided to use new clothing like the coats in the picture. To help emphasize the fact that we are far from the end of our lives.

" But there are also artist videos that are more like cinema, because they have a beginning, an end, and we sit down to watch them"

-Armand Mech

Christian Boltanski

Christian Boltanski

               Christian Boltanski was born on September 6th, 1944 in Paris, France. He still lives there today. He is 67 years old and has been an artist since he was only 14 years old.  When he was young, he was a very good painter and he decided to pursue his artistic interests rather than go to school.  He was not noticed for his work until 1960 when he released some short films and published a few notebooks.  

               He had a number of exhibitions.  His first exhibition was in 1968, when he was just 24. This exhibition was presented through a short film and many sketches with life-sized marionettes. His work then continued into the 1970's where he created photo albums and autobiographic films on what his childhood was and could have been. He was known for also creating fictional characters.  He also created photo albums and autobiographical films using his fictional characters. He created autobiographies of the person, what they liked, and what they did.  He included actual objects and journal entries.

               In 1976, he released his concept of "average taste" through his work. In this portion of his career, he withdrew to what he did as a child. He took photographs using an amateur skill and printed them in painting sized dimensions. He thought this would appeal better to the average person, which it did. In 1985, he started over again, trying new things. The "Monuments" series was born. In this, he created many photos to be represented on a massive scale. He printed photos and placed them in altar-like settings and filled entire rooms with photos lit by small lights, almost like stars.

               Christian Boltanski's work is very moving and experimental. His photos range from simple portraits of people to mounds of clothes. His work can be very odd and in some cases just flat-out strange.  But for some reason people are drawn to them likely for the sole reason that they are unique. Christian has a way of taking very simple things and making the viewer think about them. He takes a single object from a fictional character's childhood and is able to create an entire story from it. He takes simple, "amateur" style photographs and turns them into works of art. A good example is this photograph.

This is Christians gallery on March 1st of 2001 called "Coming and Going" in New York. He took many'a'photo and placed them in completely random order, using simple frames and hard, coloured light to create his final product. It's simple, very simple, and yet it looks absolutely fantastical. The way the portraits are aligned, the way he arranges the lights on the wall in a square-like pattern. Everything is simple. People believe this to be his best trait. He takes simple things and makes them seem like masterpieces. Christian says that he can take from 10 minutes to 10 years to come up with an idea, and in the end it's still a simple one, one that anyone could think of, one that seems stupid. He finds it silly how easy it is to make money once you are famous. "They give me money and I give them nothing". He said this during his exhibition in Mexico, where he had a 600 square foot room to work with. He decided to display blue tarps over a wooden frame that would  be covered in hard white light to create pure black shadows. He then says that afterward, he had it destroyed.

This was his work before his exhibition in Mexico, he said that "the shapes will be different". It was just an idea of course, which was why instead of actually going to Mexico, all he did was send a letter to tell them how to create it and set up.

One final thing about Christian Boltanski is his philosophy of living and dying. Many people find it incredibly moving in how he thinks of his life and work.

For instance, this is one of his works in Paris at the Grand Palais. It is of a grid pattern of clothing and in the centre a massive amount of wrecked sweaters, dress', pants and shirts. A small crane goes up and down, lifting and dropping small amounts of clothing back onto the 50 tonne mound of clothes. The art is as simple as the process of picking up and dropping the clothes, as well as it is pointless. The entire building is filled by the sound of heart-beats. These are recordings of over 50,000 people, their heartbeats all unique, just like all of his work. His philosophy follows the same idea, we all have unique properties but at the same time we are all so simple. This work is so far from the fact  of death and yet so close to the idea. His work has all sorts of attributes that are similar to death, the slow heartbeat of a person, who at some point, will not have a beat of any kind. The dust covering all his work to show that time has effects even on simple objects, and even the clothing itself, bright children's clothing to old tattered shirts from a garbage bin. He does not believe in art as being a preservation of one's self, just an extension. He does not like people who create art in hopes that they will live forever, he believes that we must be content with the idea of dying. A lot of people have trouble grasping this idea since it is so impossible to ignore.

               He says that he usually sits around and doesn't do much.  The life of art is easy for him and he finds it too easy at times. He creates such simple things and doesn't really care what happens to them. Whenever he creates a large exhibition, he says he tries his best to organize his pieces to create a beginning and an end.  He wants people to feel uncomfortable or at least uncomfortable with the fact that the show will eventually end. Doing this creates a great emotional response in his viewers, which many people find terrific.

This was the photo taken by me chosen from about twenty just like it. It was hard to decide which one was the best when they were almost identical. I decided to do the exact same thing Christian did for his Mexico project. I asked Rachel Wolf and Samantha Kelly to randomly throw their coats on a table in the studio. Just like the people in Mexico had done for his gallery, I had Rachel and Samantha follow simple instructions. Then I set up 2 lights without a diffuse and put as close as possible to create the hardest shadows possible. I used coats instead of a tarp because I wanted to fuse 2 of his best pieces together. From his work in the Grand Palais in Paris and from his gallery in Mexico. Using the harsh light on random articles of clothing helps me convey two different ideas very well. The fact that we are just teenagers and we have a lot of life ahead of us, hence the use of new-looking clothing instead of a mix of clothing like Christian used. Christian was always so obsessed with the idea of death, this was why he always had old material in his pieces. Since we are young, I decided to use new clothing like the coats in the picture. To help emphasize the fact that we are far from the end of our lives.

" But there are also artist videos that are more like cinema, because they have a beginning, an end, and we sit down to watch them"

-Armand Mech

Thought it looked cool

I took this on the way out of graffiti ally, I used a 1/40 second exposure, then I twised the camera while I was taking the photo. I thought it looked pretty funky. It has nothing to do with my curiculum Ms. Zannini... just thot it looked cool...

Breaking teh Rules

For these three photos I attempted to break the rules of photography... Which didn't turn out as well as I had anticipated. It was actually difficult to break rules despite the fact that I was not trying to use them, they just turn up no matter what photo you took. So I decided to focus on one rule, the most prominent, the rule of thirds.

For my first photo I was walking behind the group and I noticed that everyone was bunched up, it almost looked like the end of a line. Sometimes if an opening popped up, I could see all the way to the first person in the line. So I took advantage of this and tried to get everyone in the center of the frame, thrying to get everyone the farthest from the "focus points". I didn't really check this photo while I was there, I should have because I think I could have gotten a better one.

My second photo, I like, there are several things that fall just off of the "focus points". I took this on the intersection before graffiti ally, since I had a few minutes to play with settings I took about 7 photos of this. I really liked using a higher exposure because it helped make solid colours "pop" more. You can see this because of the McDonalds sign, the white car and the graffiti to the left of the McDonalds sign. By only eliminating one rule, I was able to allow other to stay therfore creating an enjoyable photo to look at... I think.

For my last photo, I dunno. This was taken by accident. I wanted people in the foreground, but not EVERYONE. I like this one because although people fall on the "focus points", your attention is still drawn to the pink bike because of it's extremely contrasting colour. I think it breaks the rules by breaking the rules. It's cool how the bike is still the main focus point despite the fact that "elements of design" say it should not be. I find it interesting how great this terrible photo turned out!

3rd Alternative Process - MULTIPLE EXPOSURE

For this one I took a picture of Rachel's feet in mid stride in the studio room using 1:1 Lighting. I then brought the photo into Photoshop to add the "board" she is walking on. My original idea was slightly different but I changed it because I though the flat board looked nicer. I then found some pictures of trees and buildings, cropped them out, and printed them onto an acetate.

After my first attempt the photo looked awful due to the crappy printer in the library. So I had Ms Zannini photocopy the paper copies of the pictures I had. Then it looked better. The vertical lines had been eliminated and the photo looked more "full". I also noticed that the buildings and trees looked a little dry. So I added a star field photo I created in Photoshop to add more volume to the photo. Then the photo came together.

My final exposers looked awesome, I made two, one with the original idea of the star field coming out of Rachel's boot, and a second of it just on the board. The one of the stars coming out of the foot seemed to just look better. So I dried it off, slapped it into Photoshop, filled in the background with a gradient, and threw it on my blog.

2nd ALTERNATIVE PROCESSSSSSSSS!

I really LOVED how this process turned out, it was just awesome and funky and... nyuuuuuuuuuugh. I decided to use a shot of buildings I took in Toronto. I thought it would make a really interesting print. When I was making the print I actually had no clue what I was going to put the print on. It wasn't until the day I was exposing my photo that I decided to put it on a shirt that already had a design of a urban setting.

To make the silk screen, I first printed out an acetate of the photo I wanted. When I was in the library I noticed that the buildings alone would be a little boring so I decided to throw the planet earth into the picture, made it look better I think. I then placed them under the screen and flipped the switch, waited 6 minutes and scrubbed like crazy for around 45 minutes. Of course this was all after the creating and painting of the silk screen which was a pain because it stuck to the bottom of the dark room cupboard and was a mission to get out...

When I was printing onto sheets of paper to check my design out, I noticed that one solid colour wasn't that awesome, so I threw some red in there. It was pretty cool and looked even better on the shirt. I was a little disappointed because I got a small drop of red fabric paint of the side of the shirt and forgot to put some spot remover on it and only iron the design. So now I have a silly little line on the side but it doesn't really matter.

All in all it was a pretty awesome silk screen and if I find the time I would like to print onto more shirts! Because Ms Zannini said that she might steal the one I made...

1st Alternative Process

I used one of my photos from Toronto to create this acrylic lift. I tried one before this but it did not turn out as well as I expected, the back was fluffy and I think I did too many layers of gel medium. So I tried with this photo which surprisingly I just snapped when I was walking across a street and Ms Zannini told me to "HURRY UP!!!" For a photo that took little to no preparation, it turned out really nicely.

I printed this out as it was, no alteration of contrast or brightness and taped it down to a piece of construction paper. I then took 3 days to layer on gel medium, I lost count but I think I used about 12 layers by the end. Then I took it to the water and started scrubbing. It took me 2 days to get it right after constantly asking "is this done, can I rub more off?".

When it came to taking the picture, I was stuck. I couldn't find a way to make the picture look "good". I finally asked Ms Zannini how I could make it look nice and she suggested holding it up to the light in the studio. I modified this by placing the picture right on top of one of the lights. It was a little troublesome because it would start to melt and get stretchy if I left it on the light for to long, I had to take the picture reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally quickly. I saw that it still didn't look good enough so I decided to try placing the original photo underneath, it was really cool because it created a sort of reverse duplicate type of effect.

I was then done... ha

The Mona Rachel

The Renaissance was a cultural movement in Europe starting in the 14th century and ended roughly in the 17th century, it was the kick starter for most of today's academic studies as well. These include art, science, literature and an assortment of others. Some of the most influential scientists, writters and artist's lived in this time period. Galileo (a famous astronomer), William Shakespeare (a famous play writer) and Leonardo Da Vinci, the painter of the Mona Lisa, which was the painting subject for this assignment.

The Mona Lisa was an oil painting on a poplar canvas by Leonardo Da Vinci and was a self portrait of Leonardo himself, and took him more than 16 years to complete (1503 - 1519). This was because he was know to start things but never finish them. It is one of the most popular paintings around the world and one the "most used" paintings by the Avant-garde society of art. It is currently on display at the Musée du Louvre in Paris, and is priced at 100 million dollars.

For this assignment, I used 1:1 lighting with a shutter speed of 1/40 and an aperture of 4. I had Samantha's laptop right next to me with the Mona Lisa open so I could get Rachel to sit just right! It took me a while to get the lighting right because I wanted to use as little Photoshop as I could. The light on the right side of Rachel's face was very close (only about a meter away), while the second was just a fill light about 3 meters away to help lighten the shadows. I had taken several pictures before I decided to make Rachel have a very subtle smile, I did not notice that the Mona Lisa had a smile till that point and was glad I caught it. One last thing was once I got home I noticed that the eyes on the Mona Lisa are looking directly at the viewer! I could not fix this and had to have a "Mona-Rachel" looking to the left, but whatever, IT'S STILL BEAUTIFUL!

And yes, I procrastinated to post this till Sunday...

Mixed Lighting

For mixed lighting, I decided to half light the face with natural light coming in at a 45 degree angle from above, the devils pit seemed like a good area because of the second floor windows.  I thought that this would help create shadows under the eyebrows, nose and bottom lip without being too harsh. The first photo I took was just using the light on the left from the window in the devil's pit and a large piece of white paper on the right to get a very faint glow on the cheek.
For the second photo I attempted to use the flash as a secondary, artificial, source of light instead of the paper. It did not turn out well. I found that I could adjust the power of the flash and set it to 1/8 the standard power, It gave me this nice result of a slightly more powerful glow on the right cheek and gave a bit more " of a shine" to the hair. It also took me about 5 different shots because Sam kept look directly at the camera!

Studio Lighting

For this photo, I used 0:1 lighting to get a shadow on one side, I also used a light piece of paper to help fill the
left side of her face to that we could still see facial features.

I liked this photo because of it's "sepia" tone. This was unintentional and was pleased and surprised to get such a warm colour. I used 1:1 lighting with the light on the right side being about  meter farther away then the one on the left. The shadow produced on her cheek was purposely done by having her bangs block the light.

This was just one that I took randomly, but I really liked it. The lighting was 2:0 with one facing at a 45 degree angle and one right beside her to get the light to shine behind her head, like I said, this was just taken randomly but it turned out better that some of the ones that I had set up for!

Painting With Light

In this photo, i decided to try something different, instead of just painting light swirls with a flashlight, I tried to see if changing the lighting would affect the picture. IT DID! I was very pleased to see that by flashing the light on different areas and moving while the light was off would create an exact duplicate. I then tried this with myself and was very pleased with the results.

CLONES!

Banner

For this I decided to challenge myself by only using the subject matter I had in a few rooms, I saw that everyone was going all over the place to get their photos and I knew I could find all of them almost from where I sat. This is why all my photos are from the atrium and the art room.

THE FIRST POST!!!

For my first post i decided to post a picture of a lengthened exposure of the north sky. I really like night photography because it allows you to capture things not visable with the human eye. My friend and I attempted to do this during the summer and came up with some good results, although the picture was blurry because of the moving sky we were able to get the image of the milky way and some bright stars.